[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp
From: |
Albert Reiner |
Subject: |
Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp |
Date: |
06 Apr 2006 23:30:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
[Sébastien Vauban <ewgeocaufsfb@spammotel.com>, Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:23:16 GMT]:
> I've just installed Slime and CLisp. Very good choice, I think.
Indeed, but for Common Lisp:
Clisp is one of many implementations of Common Lisp, which is a
completely different kind of Lisp than Emacs Lisp. And Slime is only
designed to help with Common Lisp.
> And, *not* being an expert at all in both languages, I don't
> know if their differences are so big it's purely impossible to
> do what I want, or if it's still possible to debug Emacs Lisp
> code with Slime/CLisp?
I suspect so.
Albert.
- Slime and Emacs Lisp, Sébastien Vauban, 2006/04/06
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp,
Albert Reiner <=
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Tim X, 2006/04/07
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Sébastien Vauban, 2006/04/07
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Tim X, 2006/04/08
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Julian Stecklina, 2006/04/09
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/10
- Re: Slime and Emacs Lisp, Tim X, 2006/04/10