[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam, imap: false pos: use-BBDB-exclusive, use-blacklist,
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: spam, imap: false pos: use-BBDB-exclusive, use-blacklist, |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:39:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) |
>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
Ted> Open the article(s) in question, hit `t' to display
Ted> everything, then run the following functions:
Ok I do this, but what do I gain, from displaying everything?
Ted> M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB 'spam-use-blacklist
Ted> "SPAM.REAL") M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB-exclusive
Ted> "SPAM.HAM")
Strange results,
In gnus 5.10.6 (or better the official XEmacs version 1.78) I get
nil in both cases
However in the snap shot I installed yesterday (and which works after
some problems)
I get
M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB 'spam-use-blacklist "SPAM.REAL")
"SPAM.REAL"
M-: (spam-split 'spam-use-BBDB-exclusive "SPAM.HAM")
"SPAM.HAM"
Ted> What do you get?
Ted> These two tests simulate exactly what happens when the mail
Ted> is split. If you get the results you expect, something else
Ted> is wrong. If you don't, you need to send me your BBDB,
Ted> blacklist file, and message(s) that are not processed
Ted> correctly.
This is correct? If so I will stick to the new snapshot version for a
while and then give spam-stat a try.[1]
Thanks
Uwe
Ted> Let's keep the discussion in this newsgroup.
Ted> Thanks Ted
Footnotes:
[1] a little of topic, anybody as a good advice how to deal with
false positives, when using IMAP and no external filter program, such
as bogofilter.