[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
From: |
Tim McNamara |
Subject: |
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document. |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:17:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com (Mike Cox) writes:
> I recently switched to xemacs as my default word processor so I
> could do formatting in TEX for a very long document. Most recently
> I've been using Microsoft Word, the latest version. I switched
> because I thought that emacs had perfect stability and no crashes.
> My perception was formed due to the constant FSF/GPL/Linux advocacy
> promoted on slashdot and all the comp newsgroups.
As a couple of minor quibbles:
1. XEmacs is not Emacs, and XEmacs is not GNU or FSF software.
XEmacs and Emacs are not interchangeable.
2. Nothing has perfect stability, everything else does not.
3. As a result, saving frequently and backing up one's documents is
always a good idea.
4. Emacs by default creates backup documents, you'll find them in
the same directory as the file you were working on with a tilde
after the filename. Hopefully XEmacs, which I've never used, does
the same thing.
See:
http://www.xemacs.org/About/XEmacsVsGNUemacs.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., (continued)
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/09/16
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Richard Taylor, 2004/09/16
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., David Kastrup, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., spike1, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., GreyCloud, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.,
Tim McNamara <=
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Craig Kelley, 2004/09/17
- Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Mike Cox, 2004/09/17
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Adrian Aichner, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Jesper Harder, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Tim McNamara, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, kier, 2004/09/18
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Brian Palmer, 2004/09/18