[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP
From: |
Richard Watson |
Subject: |
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:18:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) writes:
> I have this vague impression that nnml is more flexible and just
> plain nicer than nnimap, but I'm not sure how or why.
I'm not really convinced that it is, especially since gnus is one of
the best imap clients out there.
However if you wanted to retain nnml couldn't you do something clever
like use nnml on your Maildir via NFS whilst at home? Then you could
use nnimap while out and about.
--
Richard Watson
http://www.opencolo.com/
High Quality, Value for money colocation
- To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/14
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/15
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/15
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP,
Richard Watson <=
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, David Magda, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/17
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Christopher Browne, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/19