Re: Weird revision number on trunc.

[Yves Dorfsman]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:

> Then, after committing yet another change to the file, I get normal
> revision 1.2, so it doesn't seem to be real problem, except CVS behavior
> is really confusing in this case. What made it even more confusing is
> that in the real repository the second import was made by mistake (I
> suppose using some button in the WinCVS front-end).

If you use Wincvs, then you should use the macros:
-CVS --> Create root module
and
-Add --> Recursive Add

This way you can check in an entire directory with "normal" revision 
number.


Yves.
----
Yves Dorfsman                                             address@hidden
                                                   http://www.SollerS.ca