[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Check out fails
From: |
Rancier, Jeff |
Subject: |
RE: Check out fails |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:43:04 -0400 |
One key thing I think I ommitted, is that xinetd/cvs on Windows are
Cygwin's.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
| Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 4:28 PM
| To: address@hidden
| Cc: Rancier, Jeff; address@hidden
| Subject: Re: Check out fails
|
|
| Todd Denniston writes:
| >
| > which would imply either the user name given was invalid (for where
| > initgroups looked) or the additional group was. Does
| initgroups get pointed
| > at CVSROOT/passwd if it exists?
|
| No, it just gets the username and associated gid from the
| system passwd
| file. If the username were invalid, the passwd file lookup would have
| failed, so that's not it. If the associated gid were
| invalid, the user
| probably wouldn't be able to log in, so that's probably not
| it either.
| I do note that getgroups() can fail with EINVAL if there are
| more groups
| than will fit in the output argument. Perhaps there's an undocumented
| internal limit in initgroups() that he's running into -- how
| many groups
| is that user in?
|
| -Larry Jones
|
| I hate it when they look at me that way. -- Calvin
|
- RE: Check out fails, (continued)
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/21
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/21
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/21
RE: Check out fails,
Rancier, Jeff <=
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/21
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/28
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/28
RE: Check out fails, Rancier, Jeff, 2005/06/30