info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lock files in version 1.11.11


From: Mark D. Baushke
Subject: Re: Lock files in version 1.11.11
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:25:30 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Zanabria, Moises <address@hidden> writes:

> BTW.
> when I upgraded the version I just replaced the binary didn't run "make
> install"

Just upgrading the version of the cvs executable should be fine.

> I've just searched in all system and there is not a core file..

Hmmm... that makes it harder.

I will note that I am not sure that much testing has been done to the
SETXID_SUPPORT feature. It is disabled by default and is not normally
tested.

> also I just realized that this problem almost always occurs in the same code
> spot there is another trace:

I am not sure I understand what you realized.

> 
> first time succeed:
> S-> RCS_checkout
> (/home/p4cvs/src/ntsnapin/Security/SecurityAbout/bldnum.h,v, , , ,
> (function))
> S-> server_register(bldnum.h, 1.579, Tue Jan 13 07:00:19 2004, , , , )
> S-> Register(bldnum.h, 1.579, Tue Jan 13 07:00:19 2004, ,  )
> S-> fopen(/home/p4cvs/src/CVSROOT/history,a)
>  -> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
>  -> unlink(CVS/Entries.Log)
>  -> unlink(CVS/Base/bldnum.h)
>  -> Register(bldnum.h, 1.579, Tue Jan 13 07:00:19 2004, ,  )
> S-> Parse_Info (/home/p4cvs/src/CVSROOT/loginfo,
> ntsnapin/Security/SecurityAbout, ALL)
> S-> run_popen((echo User `id -n -u` updated NT Snapin directory; echo
> "ntsnapin/Security/SecurityAbout bldnum.h,1.578,1.579";
>  cat) | mail -s "CVS Update Report: NT Snapin Update"  address@hidden,w)
> S-> run_popen((/home/p4cvs/src/CVSROOT/dolog.pl -d /home/p4cvs/src ) >>
> /opt/www/cgi-bin/bonsai/P3/data/P3_TEMP/temp.bonsai 2
> >&1,w)
> S-> run_popen((/opt/www/cgi-bin/bonsai/P3/data/P3_TEMP/mov_bonsai_temp.sh)
> >> /dev/null 2>&1,w)
> S-> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
> S-> unlink_file(CVS/Entries.Log)
> S-> Lock_Cleanup()
>  -> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
>  -> unlink(CVS/Entries.Log)
>  -> Lock_Cleanup()

The above partial trace shows cvs running the loginfo trigger.
This second trace has insufficient context to tell me what you
were doing.

> 
> second time:
> S-> RCS_checkout
> (/home/p4cvs/src/ntsnapin/Security/SecurityAbout/bldnum.h,v, 1.579, , -ko,
> /tmp/cvs7dtkGg)
> Terminated with fatal signal 11
>  -> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
>  -> unlink(CVS/Entries.Log)
>  -> Lock_Cleanup()
> 
> Thanks.
> Moises.

        -- Mark

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zanabria, Moises 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:01 AM
> To: 'Mark D. Baushke'; Zanabria, Moises
> Cc: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: RE: Lock files in version 1.11.11 
> 
> 
> I build the binary in Linux 2.4.18 using gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat
> Linux 7.1 2.96-98) and also I compiled the source using SETXID_SUPPORT.
> 
> top/Makefile
> CC = gcc -DSETXID_SUPPORT
> 
> top/src/Makefile
> CC = gcc -DSETXID_SUPPORT
> 
> -rwxr-sr-x    1 root     cvsg    1566913 Jan 13 19:30 /usr/local/bin/cvs
> 
> 
> >>> Did you notice if /tmp/cvsnwyJm4 was populated at all?
> not at all, I've the file.
> Thanks.
> Moises.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark D. Baushke [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:51 AM
> To: Zanabria, Moises
> Cc: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: Re: Lock files in version 1.11.11 
> 
> 
> Zanabria, Moises <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Guys,
> > I'm trying to figure out what's what my problem is,  since I upgraded my
> cvs
> > binary I'm getting a bunch of cvs lock files and those are leaving in the
> > repository.
> > 
> > My last cvs server version was 1.11.5 and I've just upgrade to the latest,
> > in the past I was working with CVS 1.11.5 in the server and cvs 1.11
> client
> > for  several Unix flavors, but since I've migrated the binary to 1.11.11
> and
> > use the same (cvs 1.11) in the cvs co process or commit process the lock
> > file is not going away.
> > 
> > please let me know if that particular issue would solve if I upgrade the
> > client as well..if so what about the WinCvs Binary??
> 
> I doubt it.
> 
> > I ran the a trace and this is what I got:
> > 
> > The first time has been succeeded.  The second case failed.
> > 
> > S-> system('/local/cvscore/bin/logcheck.pl' '/tmp/cvsBfxwCc')
> > S-> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
> > S-> unlink_file(CVS/Entries.Log)
> > S-> Parse_Info (/home/p4cvs/src/CVSROOT/verifymsg,
> > common_install3/c-projects/pw
> > check, not ALL)
> > S-> unlink_file(/tmp/cvsBfxwCc)
> > S-> RCS_checkout
> > (/home/p4cvs/src/common_install3/c-projects/pwcheck/pwcheck.cpp
> > ,v, 1.8, , -ko, /tmp/cvsnwyJm4)
> 
> Right here we expect to see something like this
> 
>           --------------- expected output ---------------
> new revision: 1.9; previous revision: 1.8
> S->
> rename(/home/p4cvs/src/common_install3/c-projects/pwcheck/,pwcheck.cpp,,/hom
> e/p4cvs/src/common_install3/c-projects/pwcheck/pwcheck.cpp,v)
> done
> S-> unlink(/tmp/cvsnwyJm4)
> S-> unlink(/tmp/cvsBfxwCc)
> S-> RCS_checkout
> (/home/p4cvs/src/common_install3/c-projects/pwcheck/pwcheck.cpp,v, , , ,
> (function))
> S-> server_register (pwcheck.cpp, 1.9, www mmm dd hh:mm:ss yyyy, , , , )
> S-> Register (pwcheck.cpp, 1.9, www mmm dd hh:mm:ss yyyy, , )
>           --------------- expected output ---------------
> 
> And of course, we see this:
> > Terminated with fatal signal 11
> 
> instead.
> 
> > -> rename(CVS/Entries.Backup,CVS/Entries)
> > -> unlink(CVS/Entries.Log)
> > 
> > any clues.
> 
> Well, the server likely has a core file which would be very interesting
> to see, but it seems fairly likely that the core dump is happening while
> it is attempting to checkout version 1.8 and apply a diff to it.
> 
> You have not specified what Operating system you are using, so it is a
> lot harder to try to figure out why that operation should have caused a
> core dump. Did you notice if /tmp/cvsnwyJm4 was populated at all?
> 
> Really, it is probably going to be necessary to look at a core file to
> figure out where things went wrong.
> 
>       -- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFABbPJ3x41pRYZE/gRAoHGAKDReow6IPo57Hxz2Mr1GjxyHiwn+wCgvoi4
YI+nxQpqV9ydXfhP9zGllWY=
=nSt8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]