[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Security setup
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Security setup |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:05:04 -0500 (EST) |
Walter, Jan writes:
>
> I think we need to differentiate between "really bullet-proof security" and
> "reasonable security" - after all, security is also there to protect users
> from themselves, with no malicious intent required. I would also fathom that
> this is the cause of most data loss.
I agree. However, I think that CVS's normal configurations are
sufficient to provide the latter kind of security and any further
efforts to provide more security are misguided and probably a waste of
time. Having the repository owned by a single user, for example, only
protects against someone accidentally mucking about with the files
there, a situation which I've never heard tell of. It's easily
subverted with only the slightest of malicious intent, so is it really
worth doing? Particularly since doing so removes all traceability,
should some have such malicious intent.
-Larry Jones
Temporary insanity! That's all it was! -- Calvin
- Re: Security setup, (continued)
- Re: Security setup, Phil R Lawrence, 2002/12/17
- Re: Security setup, Larry Jones, 2002/12/17
- Re: Security setup, Mike Ayers, 2002/12/18
- Re: Security setup, Larry Jones, 2002/12/18
- Re: Security setup, Mike Ayers, 2002/12/20
- Re: Security setup, Larry Jones, 2002/12/20
Re: Security setup, Mike Ayers, 2002/12/18
Re: Security setup, Noel Yap, 2002/12/17
RE: Security setup, Walter, Jan, 2002/12/17
RE: Security setup, Walter, Jan, 2002/12/17