[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: C++, yuck!
|
From: |
Mark A. Flacy |
|
Subject: |
Re: OT: C++, yuck! |
|
Date: |
27 Feb 2002 13:55:35 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas S Urban <address@hidden> writes:
Thomas>
Thomas> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:59:48 -0500, Greg A. Woods sent 2.8K bytes:
>> "dynamic binding" isn't a feature you could ever possibly decide on
>> needing up front for any kind of project you'd ever even get close to
>> justifying C for! Get real!
Thomas>
Thomas> You're wrong. Read what I wrote again. Projects I am working on satisfy
Thomas> the description I gave. Then again, I'm not real, but I'm working on
Thomas> it.
In this case, he's correct. After all, if you need dynamic binding, then
you can't use C and therefore can't justify using it for said project. :-)
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26
- OT: C++, yuck!, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Gianni Mariani, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!,
Mark A. Flacy <=
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Noel Yap, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Noel Yap, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Noel Yap, 2002/02/27
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Glew, Andy, 2002/02/25
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/26