[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vendor branching and merge
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: vendor branching and merge |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:01:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:56:22PM -0500, Larry Jones wrote:
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> > Working on a checked out vendor branch is not always going to have the
> > correct results with CVS -- the vendor branch is too magic.
>
> Please elucidate -- I don't know of any way that import treats the
> vendor branch in a particularly magic fashion.
If you "add+commit" a new file to the vendor branch, cvs doesn't
set the RCS default branch to 1.1.1, as creating the file via
"import" would do. NOT a bug, IMO; but it is a difference that
should be borne in mind.
Not sure whether there's anything else.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
One ring to rule the mall.
- Movie review headline, eye Magazine
- vendor branching and merge, heatherw, 2002/02/22
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Eric Siegerman, 2002/02/22
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Paul Sander, 2002/02/22
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Larry Jones, 2002/02/22
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Larry Jones, 2002/02/23
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/24
- Re: vendor branching and merge,
Eric Siegerman <=
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/25
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Eric Siegerman, 2002/02/26
- Re: vendor branching and merge, Larry Jones, 2002/02/26