[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: refactoring when using CVS
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: refactoring when using CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:41:19 -0800 (PST) |
--- Paul Sander <address@hidden> wrote:
> >--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
> >If you have all of your source in one big pile, you
> can do a "javac *.java"
> >and things should sort themselves out.
>
> Unfortunately, if this is what your build procedure
> consists of, then
> you lose traceability between your sources and
> shippables, and you can't
> assess the impact of any change you make to your
> source code. That makes
> it really really hard to accomplish the common task
> of shipping minimal
> patches when bugs are found in the product.
More than that, you'd need to worry much more about
naming conventions to keep things organised and avoid
name clashes.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Tom Plunket, 2002/02/21
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/23
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/24
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/24
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/21
Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/21
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21