[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:56:29 GMT
In article <address@hidden>, Walsh, Matthew wrote:
>What I want is:
>cvs co -rTAG module
>cvs update -rBRANCH
>without losing anything out of my sandbox that isn't BRANCHed.
I'd love to tell you that the branched/non-branched mixing you are
doing is a poor idea CM, but then I suspect you'd probably tell me that
my viewpoint is rather naive, and that people all over do this with
superior, proprietary tools.
Meta-CVS: version control with directory structure versioning over top of CVS.
- update, Walsh, Matthew, 2002/02/13
- Re: update,
Kaz Kylheku <=