[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Derek R. Price
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:18:27 -0500
Larry Jones wrote:
> Derek R. Price writes:
> > Okay, that makes sense, but couldn't you achieve the same effect with a
> > library?
> > Where the exec would have been, the server's main function gets called and
> > the
> > whole process exits immediately upon return from that function?
> I don't think so. I'm not a security expert, but my understanding is
> that any code physically linked into the executable is suspect. If you
> want a more extensive discussion, move this to info-cvs where I'm sure
> Greg Woods will be happy to rehash his usual diatribes on the subject.
> (Or search the archives at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/info-cvs/.)
Of course, this sort of design does move away from the aim of a reentrant
source and the HACKING file contains reference to.
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
This score just in: OS/2, Windows 95, LinuxPPC 2000.
- Re: SSL?,
Derek R. Price <=