[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp

From: Paul D. Smith
Subject: Re: sticky directory bit vs. loginfo chgrp
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:14:45 -0500

%% address@hidden (Larry Jones) writes:

  lj> Paul D. Smith writes:

  >> However, it seems like overkill to me.  I wonder why you couldn't just
  >> use sticky bits on the repository directory?  Then all files and
  >> subdirectories created in that hierarchy would automatically inherit the
  >> gid of its containing (sticky bit set) directory, accomplishing the same
  >> goal with much less work.

  lj> That is, in fact, what is generally suggested here.

Cool; I'll change it then.

Thanks for double-checking my assumptions.

 Paul D. Smith <address@hidden>    HASMAT--HA Software Methods & Tools
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
   These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]