Re: Performance

[Michael Peck]

I was having a similar experience, well over 300 directories, and we
apply tags daily (non branching at least).

We are running local mode on NT.

We recently 're-org'd the repository, by doing a checkout of the end of
the old project, and importing that as an entirely new top-level.  It
worked great.

All cvs operations are MUCH faster now.  We got rid of a lot of empty
directories, took the oportunity to rearrange some of the sources to
match their current usage, instead of what was designed over 2 years ago
and then changed many times.  Just about all of the developers have been
very happy with the new repos.

Robert Bresner wrote:

> Howdy --
>
> What about the CVS repository itself?
> Our repository has grown into quite the bohemoth in the
> last few years. It's 150 some directories, making up almost
> 2 millions lines of code.
> There are at least 17 live branches. Some files have, literally,
> thousands of versions.
>
> How much of a slow down is caused by such a large repostiory?
>
> Rob
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs