|
From: | Holger Hans Peter Freyther |
Subject: | Re: [Help-smalltalk] Correct way to throw exceptions/errors from C to ST |
Date: | Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:42:53 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 05:44:52PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote: > That sounds bad. I don't want to spawn a new process whenever I send a > message to the smalltalk scripts for performance reasons (unless running > a smalltalk process is so lightweight you don't notice it). Do I have to > use a different call? I didn't find anything better than this. Smalltalk processes are cheap. You need an execution environment for thisContext and others and the easiest is to create a temporary call-in process.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |