[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK
From: |
Mike Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:39:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050711) |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> The browser is another story. The model-dispatcher system is incredibly
> complicated and I never really unravelled it. Even the Namespace
> browser was mostly done by cut'n'paste'n'hope-it-works, I'm not very
> pleased to say...
I think the model-dispatcher system is quite elegant, but I couldn't
apply it easily to widgets like the GtkTextBuffer/View, where a lot of
the state is held outside of the image (unless you want to do a lot of
duplication).
> It will have less flexibility for the toolkit user though. It can be
> really useful to have wrappers that convert a Smalltalk model to a GTK+
> model, or something like that.
In fact you *have* to have some kind of proxy system if you want to be
able to restart the image. That doesn't *have* to be a set of wrappers
(for example, it could be a text representation of the interface like
glade or XUL), but having wrappers is the most obvious way.
Mike
- [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Jan Vrany, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK,
Mike Anderson <=
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Mike Anderson, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, David Given, 2006/10/05
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Jan Vrany, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Mike Anderson, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, David Given, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Mike Anderson, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Bram Neijt, 2006/10/08
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] BLOX vs GTK, Luca Bruno, 2006/10/08