Re: Unexpected OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER behavior

[Kai Torben Ohlhus]

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:29 AM, mpender <address@hidden> wrote:

Is there a better alternative than OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER available to use that
will be persistent for the duration of the Octave process?

Hi,

a simple

double *d = new double[1024];

doesn't meet your requirements?

Best,

Kai