help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?


From: Joza
Subject: Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:34:51 -0700 (PDT)

Sorry, I forgot I shouldn't have such numbers there ... I'll replace the
likes of j=999:1000 with j = n-1:n.

The code works fine for a 10x10 matrix that I tried. But Octave won't churn
out an answer with 1000x1000. I'm quite new to sparse matrices so I'm
wondering if there are ways to speed up the code or optimize it, perhaps by
taking advantage of the sparse matrix's properties?



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Successive-Over-Relaxation-what-is-wrong-Improvements-tp4646041p4646046.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]