[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sumsq vs. sumsqr
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: sumsq vs. sumsqr |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:32 -0500 |
On 3 February 2012 14:33, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there a particular reason that octave uses 'sumsq' instead of matlab's
> 'sumsqr'?
Probably because Octave had sumsq first, Matlab didn't have anything,
and then Matlab grew a neural network toolbox which added sumsqr.
I'm just guessing, though. I don't see a pressing need to copy a
function from a rather specialised Matlab toolbox into Octave core.
Matlab's sumsqr also does something different than Octave's sumsq.
- Jordi G. H.
- sumsq vs. sumsqr, Muhali, 2012/02/03
- Re: sumsq vs. sumsqr,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=