[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: var(1) = 0 ??
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: var(1) = 0 ?? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:52:28 +0100 |
On 28 Jan 2012, at 17:11, pathematica wrote:
> After a little reflection, I note that the proposed inclusion reads well
> (alerting to behaviour based on the number of elements in the set passed to
> it) but, whilst the description of the change is true ("behaviour when input
> is a scalar"), it is not comprehensive. For example, the dialogue at the
> terminal shown above demonstrates "behaviour when input is a vector of order
> one" as well behaviour when it is a scalar.
the correct description would have been "behaviour when the function is applied
along a singleton dimension of an array".
but the description of the change is just a mnemonic message of use to
developers only, users will probably never even see it,
so what's really important is the function docstring.
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, (continued)
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, Muhali, 2012/01/27
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, c., 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, c., 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??,
c. <=
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/01/28