help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave-3.4.3 64-bit indexing


From: Joe Smith
Subject: Re: Octave-3.4.3 64-bit indexing
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:03:02 -0800 (PST)

Yes, I read the sections of the manual on building Octave for the 32 and 64.  It too does not provide details of which version all work together.  It seems to lag the current versions.   I am not even sure if this is the problem.     
             


From: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
To: Joe Smith <address@hidden>
Cc: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Octave-3.4.3 64-bit indexing

Please reply on the list so others may comment.

Did you read the section in the manual about building with the
--enable-64 configure option?

jwe


On 23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:

| John,

| Thank you for the response.

| The version that was supplied with CAELinux 2011 (which is now available for
| 64 bit systems only) is unable to handle my large data sets.

| This appears to be the same information on Wiki.  Notice the version of
| SuiteSparse is not defined.  Do you know if 3.6.1 will work with LAPACK 3.2.1
| and are these versions compatible with Octave 3.4.3? 



| From: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
| To: Joe Smith <address@hidden>
| Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
| Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:06 PM
| Subject: Octave-3.4.3 64-bit indexing
|
| On 23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:
|
| | This is my first post to this list.  If this is the wrong place to post
| | questions, feel free to correct me.
| |
| | I am trying to build Octave 3.4.3 on Ubuntu 10.04.  I am using lapack-3.4.0,
| | suitesparse-3.6.1.  This is on an Intel Xeon W3680.  I attempted to follow
| the
| | instructions on wiki but have not had any luck getting it working.  I rebuilt
| |  lapack, standard blas, suitesparse using the 64-bit settings.  I copied the
| | libs (renamed the suitesparse ones to match octave defaults) and ran the
| | configuration using the 64-bit setting and pointing to my lapack, blas and
| | suitesparse.  This appears to be fine.  No errors about the blas not being
| | 64-bit.  I build Octave it that seems fine but when I run make check it fails
| | with the following:
| |
| | src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc  .......panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping
| myself
| | ...
| |
| | If I run:
| | ./run-octave -g
| | run
| | octave:2> cd tests
| | octave:2> fntests
| |
| | I see:
| | src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc .......
| | Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
| | 0x00007ffff5b9339a in ztrsv_ () from /usr/src/octave-3.4.3/libcruft/.libs/
| | libcruft.so.0
| |
| | Any help anyone can provide to get Octave working would be great.
| | I have next to no programming skills, so if there is something you need me
| | to try, please provide as many details as possible.
|
| Why do you think you need to use the --enable-64 configure option?
|
| Have you read the explanation of how to build Octave using this option
| in the manual?
|
| http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/
| Compiling-Octave-with-64_002dbit-Indexing.html#
| Compiling-Octave-with-64_002dbit-Indexing
|
| jwe
| 23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:
|
23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:

| John,

| Thank you for the response.

| The version that was supplied with CAELinux 2011 (which is now available for
| 64 bit systems only) is unable to handle my large data sets.

| This appears to be the same information on Wiki.  Notice the version of
| SuiteSparse is not defined.  Do you know if 3.6.1 will work with LAPACK 3.2.1
| and are these versions compatible with Octave 3.4.3? 



| From: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
| To: Joe Smith <address@hidden>
| Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
| Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 3:06 PM
| Subject: Octave-3.4.3 64-bit indexing
|
| On 23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:
|
| | This is my first post to this list.  If this is the wrong place to post
| | questions, feel free to correct me.
| |
| | I am trying to build Octave 3.4.3 on Ubuntu 10.04.  I am using lapack-3.4.0,
| | suitesparse-3.6.1.  This is on an Intel Xeon W3680.  I attempted to follow
| the
| | instructions on wiki but have not had any luck getting it working.  I rebuilt
| |  lapack, standard blas, suitesparse using the 64-bit settings.  I copied the
| | libs (renamed the suitesparse ones to match octave defaults) and ran the
| | configuration using the 64-bit setting and pointing to my lapack, blas and
| | suitesparse.  This appears to be fine.  No errors about the blas not being
| | 64-bit.  I build Octave it that seems fine but when I run make check it fails
| | with the following:
| |
| | src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc  .......panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping
| myself
| | ...
| |
| | If I run:
| | ./run-octave -g
| | run
| | octave:2> cd tests
| | octave:2> fntests
| |
| | I see:
| | src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc .......
| | Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
| | 0x00007ffff5b9339a in ztrsv_ () from /usr/src/octave-3.4.3/libcruft/.libs/
| | libcruft.so.0
| |
| | Any help anyone can provide to get Octave working would be great.
| | I have next to no programming skills, so if there is something you need me
| | to try, please provide as many details as possible.
|
| Why do you think you need to use the --enable-64 configure option?
|
| Have you read the explanation of how to build Octave using this option
| in the manual?
|
| http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/
| Compiling-Octave-with-64_002dbit-Indexing.html#
| Compiling-Octave-with-64_002dbit-Indexing
|
| jwe
| 23-Nov-2011, Joe Smith wrote:
|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]