[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve'
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve' |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:21:28 +0200 |
ons, 12 10 2011 kl. 16:53 +0200, skrev Olaf Till:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:21:57PM +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > ons, 12 10 2011 kl. 14:02 +0000, skrev bpabbott:
> > > It does look strange.
> > >
> > >
> > > Have you looked at the 2nd (function values) and 3rd (termination
> > > status) outputs of fsolved?
> >
> > Hmm, okay... it seems like the algorithm converges to different solution
> > each time. The problem I'm solving is under-determined so it does not
> > surprise me that the solver can converge to different solutions, but I
> > am surprised that this happens when the solver is given the same
> > starting conditions. Does 'fsolve' perform any random steps?
> >
> > Søren
>
> Wild guess: hardware floating point randomness (maybe due to
> differences between processor cores?) which has only "negligible"
> effect on accuracy, but could change the course of optimization in
> under-determined problems...
Could be. Do you have any idea on how to determine if this is indeed the
case?
Søren
- Random timing results with 'fsolve', Søren Hauberg, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', bpabbott, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Søren Hauberg, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', bpabbott, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Søren Hauberg, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Olaf Till, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve',
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Olaf Till, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Sergei Steshenko, 2011/10/12
- Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Francesco Potortì, 2011/10/12
Re: Random timing results with 'fsolve', Martin Helm, 2011/10/12