[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: differential equation
|
From: |
Joshua Stults |
|
Subject: |
Re: differential equation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 May 2011 14:52:54 -0400 |
Oops, forgot to reply to the list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joshua Stults <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: differential equation
To: Liam Groener <address@hidden>
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Liam Groener <address@hidden> wrote:
> Actually, I see that I forgot the I' part of the original d.e., so back to
> the drawing boards.
Extending your original approach, you can take the derivative of the
Vs - Rs I = V equation and eliminate I' as well as I; then you have a
single second order ode in V with a forcing term that includes Vs and
Vs'. This doesn't solve the op's problem with infinite Vs' though.
--
Joshua Stults
Website: variousconsequences.com
Hackerspace: daytondiode.org
--
Joshua Stults
Website: variousconsequences.com
Hackerspace: daytondiode.org