[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parcellfun and rand
From: |
Francesco Potortì |
Subject: |
Re: parcellfun and rand |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:20:10 +0200 |
>> octave:> disp(parcellfun(2, inline("randn(2,1)"), cell(1,2),
>> "verboselevel", 0))
>> -1.04528 -1.04528
>> -0.37886 -0.37886
>
>this kind of thing is quite important, for example, in Monte Carlo studies,
>which can be done in parallel but usually need a randomization, and that is,
>uncorrelated output from the above example.
>
>How do I get this?
The current version does not have this problem (unless you find a bug).
Try it:
<http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/general/inst/parcellfun.m?revision=7676>
For Monte Carlo simulations, note that they are not reproducible, as the
number of jobs scheduled to each process is not predictable.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
- parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/05
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand,
Francesco Potortì <=
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/08
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/08