[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it a feature? no minor ticks on log plot in default
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Is it a feature? no minor ticks on log plot in default |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:09:53 -0400 |
On Apr 10, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Apr 10, 2010, at 1:00 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> In the one of the thread of octave in Japan, there is a topic minor ticks
>>> of the plot.
>>>
>>> x=1:100;
>>> loglog(x,x);
>>>
>>> The plot has no minor ticks on default.
>>>
>>> Is it a feature?
>>>
>>> Of course,
>>>
>>> set (gca, 'xminortick', 'on', 'yminortick', 'on');
>>>
>>> makes the minortick on.
>>>
>>> If this is a feature, it is no problem for me.
>>> This post will be a note for users.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Tatsuro
>>
>> Does the attached fix the problem for you?
>>
>> Ben
>
> I neglected to consider the case where nextplot == "replacechildren" ...
> actually that is the case for Matlab. Apparently Octave currently uses
> "replace_children" in graphics.cc.in. However, the gnuplot backend is throws
> an error if nextplot is set the "replace_children".
>
> In any event, I've attached a changeset that should ensure compatibility with
> Matlab.
>
> If there are no objections, I'll push it.
>
> Ben
>
> <changeset.patch>
I've pushed the change below.
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/153e6226a669
Ben