Re: sprank

[Ulrich Staudinger]

I don't know where you live (and i don't want to know), but talking about the states, germany, switzerland, france, great britain etc. we have the notion of an amount in controversy. 
Quoting wikipedia: 
"Amount in controversy (sometimes called jurisdictional amount)
 is a term used in United States civil procedure to denote a requirement that persons 
seeking to bring a lawsuit in a particular court must 
be suing for a certain minimum amount before that court may hear the 
case." 

Honestly, no pig cares if you make a coffee to think properly about the email of that guy. 

But every court will care if you buy books, hire consultants and develop something which you are then going to bill this guy's company for, because he asked for help and you "just" tried to be so nice to answer. 




Heaven help ...

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Staudinger
<address@hidden> wrote:
> No I am not, but it's clear that a court won't work for nothing, or will it?

If you don't actually know, maybe you shouldn't be so certain. At
least where I live, we don't pay the Courts for access to legal
protection.

> Do you think, some court in the world would act on some USD 10 amount in
> dispute ? Let your human sense kick in ...

Common sense has very little to do with modern legal systems.


--judd

-- 
Kind regards, 
Ulrich B. Staudinger