RE: not finding libumfpack.so.3.2.0

[dastew]

> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:05:23 -0500
> Subject: Re: not finding libumfpack.so.3.2.0
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden; address@hidden
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I suspect this is related to a bug in the debian octave package that
> > was reported a while ago, but that seems to have been ignored. The
> > octave install script calls "octave" instead of using the full and
> > versioned path. So anything that is executable called octave gets
> > called instead of the version being installed by the package depending
> > on your PATH.
>
> Sorry, I slightly mis-remembered the bug. The postinst script *does*
> append the version string, it just doesn't specify the path. If you
> type
>
> $ type -all octave-3.2.2
>
> what do you see?
>
>
> --judd


address@hidden:~$ type -all octave-3.2.2
octave-3.2.2 is /usr/local/bin/octave-3.2.2
octave-3.2.2 is /usr/bin/octave-3.2.2


Ok so is there is confusion from the old copy that I compiled ?

doug