[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C)
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C) |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:10:06 +0100 |
tor, 19 11 2009 kl. 08:34 +0100, skrev David Grundberg:
> I think its unnecessary to discuss Octave at all. Pytave is licensed
> under GPLv3 on its own, and it doesn't matter what libraries it in turn
> uses. Since Pytave consists of Python code and is GPLv3, any other
> Python script that uses Pytave is a derivate work of Pytave.
I don't think you can make license requirements about _scripts_. See,
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
Søren
- calling octave from C, Philipp Leser, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, David Grundberg, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C),
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Ulrich Staudinger, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20