Re: octave and delay ode's

[Carlo de Falco]

Thomas,

On 2 Nov 2009, at 20:26, Thomas Treichl wrote:

> Because there is an "ode" in the subject of the email, yes, but I  
> also must say that I currently don't have the time to dig into this  
> problem and can only provide a short answer: if the above equations  
> form the DDE problem then Carlo's implementation does make more  
> sense to me.

Thanks for your answer, I was not 100% sure I was doing things  
correctly as
it seems to me that the case of mutiple delays is not fully clear from  
the documentation (I looked at the implementation to find out the  
meaning of LAGS).
So if you believe my interpretation was correct, would you mind if I  
commit the patch below to improve the documentation of the DDE  
functions?

> Best regards
>  Thomas

c.

patch.txt
Description: Text document