[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plotting with 3.2.0 on Windows is SLOOOOOOWWWW
|
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
|
Subject: |
Re: Plotting with 3.2.0 on Windows is SLOOOOOOWWWW |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:30:40 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- Francesco Potorti` wrote:
>
> I have not understood the last paragraph, however the memory amount
> between the two systems (512M versus 1G) could make a significant
> difference, if the working set of the kernel, octave and gnuplot exceeds
> 512MB.
>
It is possible. However the slowness did not occur on octave 3.2.0 on
cygwin-1.7.
See
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-Plotting-with-3.2.0-on-Windows-is-SLOOOOOOWWWW-p24706929.html
Do you think that Octave 3.2.0 on cygwin uses smaller size of memory than that
by octave 3.2.0 native
to windows (octave built by MinGW) ?
I cannot deny the possibility at the moment.
Anyway I would like to test John's patch at the computer in my home.
Regards
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/