|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: cellfunc vs cell2mat speed? |
Date: | Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:15:53 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080725) |
Levente Torok wrote:
Hi All, I am just wondering why is it so difficult to convert a cell array to matrix? I used cellfunc on cell array of 59000 cells which took 7 seconds but the conversion to a matrix of size 443320 , 7 took about 1080 seconds on my machine. The cell2mat on the same data took appx 150 times more time. I am just shocked. Should I replace the original cell2mat with a C routine? Lev
Short example please. The above is not much use as a bug report. D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |