Aw: Re: symbolic toolbox returns error

[giovanni . lombardo]

> What library is supposed to define that function?  is
> your symbols.oct file linked with that library?

Unfortunately I have not dug deep enough into this package to know the answer.
I understood that one had simply to load the symbolic package in the same way 
as other packages are
loaded in OCTAVE.

Maybe there is some problem with the symbolic package of OCTAVE-FORGE and 
OCTAVE 3.0.0. 

Best


Gianni

----- Original Nachricht ----
Von:     "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
An:      lombardo <address@hidden>
Datum:   22.08.2008 19:23
Betreff: Re: symbolic toolbox returns error

> On 22-Aug-2008, lombardo wrote:
> 
> | Hi,
> | 
> | Thanks a lot Søren.
> |  Indeed I thought I had all the Ginac stuff needed. There doesn't seem
> | to be a ginac-devel for (k)ubuntu. I have already installed ginac-tools,
> | libginac1.4 and libginac-dev. So these don't seem to be substitutes for
> | ginac-devel. Is that correct?
> | 
> | In any case I re-installed Ginac compiling it from source (the
> | installation checks seemed to be all passed)
> | 
> | After re-installed the symbolic package I still get the error message
> | 
> | octave-3.0.0:3> symbols
> | error:
> /home/lombardo/octave/symbolic-1.0.6/i486-pc-linux-gnu-api-v32/symbols.oct:
> undefined symbol: _ZNK5GiNaC5basic5evalfEi
> | 
> | What might have gone wrong?
> 
> You can demangle this function name with
> 
>   echo _ZNK5GiNaC5basic5evalfEi | c++filt
> 
> This should show you that
> 
>   GiNaC::basic::evalf(int) const
> 
> is undefined.  What library is supposed to define that function?  is
> your symbols.oct file linked with that library?
> 
> jwe
>