Re: Plotting problem again

[Ben Abbott]

Sorry I was referring to plot3.m.

Type "which plot3" to see where it resides.

The lines refer to the plot3.m file.

In any event, it is still unclear that plot3 is intended to be used as  
you've attempted. Meaning that that functionality may not become  
permanent.

Also, you mentioned problems with "mesh" what problem did you encounter?

Ben

On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:32 AM, asha g wrote:

> It is not clear to me which plot.m you are referring to. Also which  
> lines 266-276? Is this in gnuplot? If so, where do I get it from?
> Asha
>
>            Goals too clearly defined can become blinkers.   Mary  
> Catherine Bateson
>
>
> --- On Mon, 6/2/08, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: Plotting problem again
> > To: address@hidden
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Date: Monday, June 2, 2008, 5:15 PM
> > On Jun 2, 2008, at 2:39 AM, asha g wrote:
> > > --- On Mon, 6/2/08, Ben Abbott
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
> > > > Subject: Re: Plotting problem again
> > > > To: address@hidden
> > > > Cc: address@hidden
> > > > Date: Monday, June 2, 2008, 7:31 AM
> > > > On Jun 1, 2008, at 7:30 PM, asha g wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > Thanks for looking into my problem. I am
> > resending the
> > > > code so that
> > > > > the problem becomes clear. I hope it is a bug
> > that can
> > > > be fixed soon
> > > > > so I can start plotting correctly again. I
> > also have
> > > > problems with
> > > > > mesh as I said before.
> > > > >
> > > > > N = 10; l = 0.6; niter = 10; deltaT =
> > 0.0017778;
> > > > > t= (niter)*deltaT;
> > > > > x =linspace(0,l,N);
> > > > > y= linspace(0,t,niter);
> > > > > vvvv =
> > > > > Columns 1 through 6:
> > > > >
> > > > > -6.9978e+01  -6.9978e+01  -6.9978e+01
> > -6.9978e+01
> > > > -6.9978e+01
> > > > > -6.9978e+01
> > > > > -6.9956e+01  -6.9956e+01  -6.9956e+01
> > -6.9956e+01
> > > > -6.9956e+01
> > > > > -6.9956e+01
> > > > > -6.9934e+01  -6.9934e+01  -6.9934e+01
> > -6.9934e+01
> > > > -6.9934e+01
> > > > > -6.9934e+01
> > > > > -6.9913e+01  -6.9913e+01  -6.9909e+01
> > -6.9915e+01
> > > > -6.9912e+01
> > > > > -6.9913e+01
> > > > > -6.9878e+01  -6.9878e+01  -7.0015e+01
> > -6.9764e+01
> > > > -6.9961e+01
> > > > > -6.9863e+01
> > > > > -7.0162e+01  -7.0162e+01  -6.4295e+01
> > -7.6717e+01
> > > > -6.4997e+01
> > > > > -7.2335e+01
> > > > > -6.3341e+01  -6.3341e+01  -3.3817e+02
> > 3.0088e+02
> > > > -3.7816e+02
> > > > > 1.1724e+02
> > > > > -1.5800e+02  -1.5800e+02   1.3585e+04
> > -2.0477e+04
> > > > 1.8784e+04
> > > > > -1.3063e+04
> > > > > -3.9643e+03  -3.9643e+03  -7.4331e+05
> > NaN
> > > > -1.1647e
> > > > > +06          NaN
> > > > >        NaN          NaN          NaN
> > NaN
> > > > > NaN          NaN
> > > > >
> > > > > Columns 7 through 10:
> > > > >
> > > > > -6.9978e+01  -6.9978e+01  -6.9978e+01
> > -6.9978e+01
> > > > > -6.9956e+01  -6.9956e+01  -6.9956e+01
> > -6.9956e+01
> > > > > -6.9934e+01  -6.9934e+01  -6.9934e+01
> > -6.9934e+01
> > > > > -6.9912e+01  -6.9912e+01  -6.9912e+01
> > -6.9912e+01
> > > > > -6.9900e+01  -6.9888e+01  -6.9890e+01
> > -6.9891e+01
> > > > > -6.8879e+01  -7.0176e+01  -6.9907e+01
> > -6.9817e+01
> > > > > -1.5895e+02  -3.8642e+01  -6.5889e+01
> > -7.4971e+01
> > > > > 6.9798e+03  -2.8032e+03  -4.0468e+02
> > 3.9483e+02
> > > > -5.2204e+05
> > > > > 2.1534e+05   2.5020e+04  -3.8420e+04
> > > > >        NaN          NaN          NaN
> > NaN
> > > > > ~
> > > > > ~
> > > > > ~
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope you can figure out what is happening
> > now.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Asha
> > > >
> > > > Using Thomas' patch plot3(x,y,vvv) gives the
> > expected
> > > > result.
> > > >
> > > > I also have no problem with mesh(x,y,vvv).
> > > >
> > > > Although I'm running the default branch from
> > jwe's
> > > > mercurial archive,
> > > > I don't see a record in the ChangeLog that
> > indicates
> > > > anything has
> > > > changed since 3.0.0 was released.
> > > >
> > > > Have you tried Thomas' patch to plot3? ... and
> > what
> > > > problem do you
> > > > encounter with mesh?
> > > >
> > > > Ben
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure how to use the patch.
> > > I am seeing that the problem surfaces when N= 10 and
> > niter = 10.
> > > In other cases eg niter = 100, N= 10, it plots but a
> > get a message
> > > saying:
> > > Notice: No surface grid anything could be hidden
> > behind
> > > Notice: No surface grid anything could be hidden
> > behind
> > > octave:3> Notice: No surface grid anything could be
> > hidden behind
> > > Mesh: I am only getting a 2-D grid and not a 3 D mesh.
> > >
> > > Asha
> >
> > Thomas' patch changes the "if" block near
> > lines 266-276 to that below
> >
> >     if (isvector (x) && isvector (y))
> >       if (isvector (z))
> >         x = x(:);
> >         y = y(:);
> >         z = z(:);
> >       elseif (length (x) == rows (z) && length (y)
> > == columns (z))
> >         [x, y] = meshgrid (x, y);
> >       else
> >         error ("plot3: [length(x), length(y)] must match
> > size(z)");
> >       endif
> >     endif
> >
> > Is that sufficient info for you to edit plot.m and make the
> > change? If
> > not I (or someone else) can give a short description of how
> > to apply
> > the patch directly.
> >
> > Ben