[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
From: |
Przemek Klosowski |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2008 13:14:44 -0400 (EDT) |
Even if you're running on AMD64, you could still be running 32-bit kernel
and then all your binaries would have to be 32-bit as well, I believe.
'uname -m' will tell you about your kernel (x86_64 or i686).
On a 64-bit Linux, you could still run either 32 or 64bit octave;
'octave -v' will tell you which one you have.
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, (continued)
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, David Bateman, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure,
Przemek Klosowski <=
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08