[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave vs. matlab speed
From: |
Peter Jensen |
Subject: |
Re: octave vs. matlab speed |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:26:24 +0100 |
Robert,
>From the previous e-mails it appears that
octave in most cases, is approx 2-3 times
slower than matlab,
In your case it is 100 times slower !!.
It would be interesting to find out
what segment of you code that causes
the big difference.
One way to profile your program is
to insert some tic/toc's. You can then
home in on the offending code.
Peter
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 15:16 -0700, Robert Uang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just discovered octave recently and I am
> thrilled about it mainly for two reasons - 1. it is
> similar to Matlab code, and 2. it is absolutely free!
>
> However, running the same procedure in Matlab is 100x
> faster than running in Octave. Can you comment on why
> this is so, and if there are any general rules of
> thumb to help speed up simulation time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave