[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oct-file version of x>0
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Oct-file version of x>0 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:14:45 -0400 |
On 24-May-2006, Keith Goodman wrote:
| On 5/24/06, Quentin Spencer <address@hidden> wrote:
| > I went ahead and updated the wiki.
|
| Thank you. When I get a password I'll add the rest of the mx_el_XX functions.
Will you please also note that these names are not documented and
subject to change (actually, that pretty much sums up the state of all
the Octave internals at this point).
For compatibility, we will probably eventually provide the following
functions at the scripting language level
plus mtimes power ge not horzcat
minus rdivide mpower ne colon vertcat
uminus ldivide lt eq transpose subsref
uplus mrdivide gt and transpose subsasgn
times mldivide le or display subsindex
and for consistency it might be good to rename most internal functions
that are used to do the real work so that their names match the ones
used in the scripting language.
We could also provide overloaded C++ operators for some.
jwe
- Oct-file version of x>0, Keith Goodman, 2006/05/23
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, Michael Creel, 2006/05/24
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, Michael Kopp, 2006/05/30
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/31
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, David Bateman, 2006/05/31
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/31
- Re: Oct-file version of x>0, David Bateman, 2006/05/31