[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave loop slowness (was "")
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: octave loop slowness (was "") |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:30:28 -0700 |
On 3/18/06, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/18/06, Shai Ayal <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I think the overall conclusion is the JIT is very hard to do and octave
> > project, which relies on volunteers, does not currently have the
> > manpower to do it. Maybe you can help?
>
> It's been a while since I've touched Java. I don't think I can help. :-(
>
JIT (Just-In-Time) compiler for octave has nothing to do with Java language.
Regards,
Dmitri.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- [no subject], Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso, 2006/03/17
- Re: octave loop slowness ( was ""), Shai Ayal, 2006/03/18
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), John W. Eaton, 2006/03/18
- RE: octave loop slowness (was ""), Paul Billings, 2006/03/20
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), Brendan Drew, 2006/03/20
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), Bill Denney, 2006/03/20
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), John W. Eaton, 2006/03/21
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), Brendan Drew, 2006/03/21
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), Przemek Klosowski, 2006/03/22
- Re: octave loop slowness (was ""), Joshua Rigler, 2006/03/20
Re:, Arvid Rosén, 2006/03/19
- Re:, Shai Ayal, 2006/03/19
- Re:, Francesco Potorti`, 2006/03/27