[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Standalone windows install: why?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Standalone windows install: why? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:28:43 -0500 |
On 31-Mar-2005, Paul Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
| If I could offer a couple of comments on this:
|
| In spite of the benefits of the Cygwin environment, folk do appear to prefer
| straight Windows installs.
Is this a religious thing? What if they don't know that they are
installing Cygwin?
If I install some proprietary binary only commericial software for
Windows, it may come with any number of add-on libraries and support
programs that are hidden behind the scenes. Why is that any different
than having a set of POSIX compatibility libraries and support
programs (i.e., Cygwin) hidden behind the scenes?
| Since gcc-4.x binaries have been available for
| Windows, the demand for my regular Cygwin snapshots has declined to a
| trickle.
Do you mean binaries of gcc that do not require Cygwin to run?
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, (continued)
- Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/30
- RE: Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, Jeff Cunningham, 2005/03/31
- Re: Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, David Bateman, 2005/03/31
- Re: Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, Jianhong Wang, 2005/03/31
- Re: Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/31
- Standalone windows install: why?, Brian Blais, 2005/03/31
- Standalone windows install: why?, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/31
- Re: Standalone windows install: why?, Brian Blais, 2005/03/31
- Re: Standalone windows install: why?, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/31
- Re: Standalone windows install: why?, Paul Thomas, 2005/03/31
- Re: Standalone windows install: why?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Can't find Octave 2.1.69 for windows, David Bateman, 2005/03/31