[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gfortran vs ranlib
From: |
Joe Koski |
Subject: |
Re: gfortran vs ranlib |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:50:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405 |
John, Dmitri,
I've been trying to use gfortran for several months, mostly with problems.
Of three codes that I tried, only one compiled successfully. My suggestion
would be to file a bug report and track it. The bug (previously reported as
17917) that killed the primary code that I use has been there, mostly
dormant ("NEW"), since October. gfortran is a very good idea, but it's not
quite there yet. I'm not enough of a computer scientist to help them. I'm
wary to install the latest gfortran version on my Mac because it may break
the very dependable g77-3.4.2 compiler that I use almost every day.
Joe
on 2/18/05 7:12 PM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov at address@hidden wrote:
> John W. Eaton wrote:
>
>> | END
>> | 1
>> | Internal Error at (1):
>> | TODO: Functions with alternate entry points
>> | make: *** [pic/qrgnin.o] Error 1
>>
>> OK, I see a way to avoid this limitation in gfortran using standard
>> f77, but does anyone know if this TODO is expected to be done before
>> GCC 4.0 is officially released?
>>
>
> There is a meta-bug on gcc bugzilla
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
>
> """
>
> This is a metabug for all issues in gfortran that need to be resolved before
> gfortran can be used as a complete replacement for g77.
>
> """
>
> Perhaps this one should be added there as well...
>
>>
>> jwe
>>
>
> Dmitri.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- FYI: compiling octave with gcc4 (no go), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- gfortran vs ranlib (was: FYI: compiling octave with gcc4 (no go)), John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib,
Joe Koski <=
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Paul Thomas, 2005/02/19
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib > to octave and gfortran lists, Paul Thomas, 2005/02/19
- octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
- octave with gcc4 done!, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/19
- Re: octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
- Re: octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
g++-4 vs. gperf (was: FYI: compiling octave with gcc4 (no go)), John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18