[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mkoctfile, need dynamic linking even for compiling a .cc file?
From: |
Henry F. Mollet |
Subject: |
Re: Mkoctfile, need dynamic linking even for compiling a .cc file? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:31:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 |
OK, now I can compile a .cc file using mkoctfile Bourne shell script to get
an .oct executable file. However, until I "upgrade" to get an octave version
with dynamic linking I won't be able to run myHell.oct nor myoregonator.oct.
Once I have "upgraded", I'll try to implement your comments below. Thanks.
Here, I'd like to comment and perhaps clarify a little the oregoator example
used in section 13.8 Dynamically Linked Function for those, who like me had
difficulties understanding the example at first. The example does not
actually integrate the 3 differential equations, it "merely" calculates the
3 derivatives, given initial concentrations of [1,2,3] at time 0. To
integrate, and get the three concentrations as a function of time, lsode
("f", x0, t) has to be added, as is nicely demonstrated in the section on
Differential Equation/Ordinary Differential Equation.
Henry
on 1/13/04 9:14 PM, Paul Kienzle at address@hidden wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2004, at 11:55 PM, Henry F. Mollet wrote:
>
>> Many thanks. These .oct files are very large!?
>
> I solved that problem on windows by making a dynamic version
> of libstdc++ (with lots of help). Anyone care to take this on
> for os x?
>
>> Probably should rename the first one to MyHell.oct.
>
> MyHell.oct must have the function FMyHell in it for the loader
> to find it. You can't rename the oct-file without changing the
> name of the DEFUN_DLD in the .cc file.
>
>> As you explained earlier, even if I had oregonator.m in the same
>> directory,
>> oregonator.oct would be used. I saw no difference in speed when running
>> oregegonator.m but I would have to incorporate cputime () into the
>> files
>> because both are completed so quickly.
>
> You won't see major gains until you move for-loops out
> of octave and into C++. Often you can do well enough
> just by vectorizing loops, but some loops can't be
> vectorized.
>
> Paul Kienzle
> address@hidden
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------