[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
flops?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
flops? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Oct 1996 12:00:33 -0500 |
On 17-Oct-1996, Victoria Abreu Sernandez <address@hidden> wrote:
: I'm a question if the function flops()
: (or something similar) is now available.
No, flops() is still a flop.
Seriously, I have no desire to add operation counts to all the code
that Octave uses (how would you do this for LSODE and DASSL, for
example?). Is this really a useful feature? For me, it sounds like a
lot of work for very little benefit.
jwe
- flops?, Victoria Abreu Sernandez [GTS], 1996/10/17