[Help-liquidwar6] Re: dual licensing

[Tim Chadburn]

This is fine with me.

Tim Chadburn

--- address@hidden wrote:
3) contributors dual-license the artwork under both
the CC
attributation-sharealike (or whatever license they
prefer...) and the
GPL. This is the choice I like best. If the
contributor uses his work 
in
other contexts than LW6 (as it is obviously the case
with Tim's
musics...) then he can still distribute them under the
CC. But, for 
LW6,
it's dual licensed CC/GPL. Actually, in this case, it
would be dual
licensed for any usage, since a "GPL'ed for LW6" makes
no sense, as the
GPL does not restrict the usages of the material it
covers, it only
covers copying, studying, modifying and distributing.

I like solution 3) best. IMHO it does not change much
things for
contributors, the GPL and CC "attribution-sharealike"
being both free
licenses, with a copyleft. As I understand it, someone
who contributes
to LW6 can understand it's a bazillion time easier to
manage the 
package
if everything is under the same license, than if it's
a per map option.





                
___________________________________________________________ 
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The 
Wall Street Journal 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html