[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC
|
From: |
Alexander Gnauck |
|
Subject: |
AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:49:29 +0100 |
> Sure, that is one way to deal with this. Libidn users may not be
> clamoring for a resolution. Other implementations may be in more of a
> rush to resolve the conflict. (I work for Google.)
What about adding a define to deal with this, and make a note in the
documentation about this "issue".
Alex
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/12
- Re: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/13
- Re: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/13
- Re: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/13
- Re: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/13
- AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC,
Alexander Gnauck <=
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/14
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/14
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/14
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/14
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/14
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/15
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/15
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/15
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Erik van der Poel, 2008/01/15
- Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/15