[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: which of the two ArchLinux PKGBUILDs is better ? -- guix on Arch suc
From: |
Nancy-Anne Cianci |
Subject: |
Re: which of the two ArchLinux PKGBUILDs is better ? -- guix on Arch success |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:50:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0 |
On 06.09.2016 22:22, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:04:32PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
>> ArchLinux installers of guix should be aware that the standard size of
>> /tmp on a 4 GB computer is too small for a full install of guix.
>>
>> Please enlarge your swap file and resize /tmp to like 20 GB, else
>> you will repeatedly break during
>>
>> guix package -i hello
>>
>> After those mods I successfully ran guix on Manjaro (Arch derivate).
>
> What exactly goes wrong when /tmp is less that 4 GB? There are a handful
> of packages that require more than 4 GB of storage while building, but I
> don't believe any of them are required to build hello.
I believe the problem was that one line was missed during install and
then no binary install was made, everything was built instead. sth.
about auth or such.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: which of the two ArchLinux PKGBUILDs is better ? -- guix on Arch success,
Nancy-Anne Cianci <=