[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automatic link specification
From: |
Piotr Sawuk |
Subject: |
Re: automatic link specification |
Date: |
23 Sep 2007 23:12:47 GMT |
In article <m3myvmoals.fsf@somewhere.in.california.localhost>,
Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@charter.net> writes:
> AlfC <alfredo.correa@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there any way to tell g++ to link to specific libraries from
>> within the source code,
>
> No.
>
> Why do you think it's a good idea to be able to do this?
>
> Cheers,
I agree, it should be the responsibility of the IDE to do such things.
IMHO Ultimate++ (upp.sf.net) is much better fit for "skript-like" c++
coding: it provides a boost-alike lib, and the concept of modularized
compilation: each project is composed of multiple packages, and each
package does store such things as lib-requirements and compiler-flags.
so, in order to use AlfC's code one only needs to select it from a
list of packages, and the linking is taken care of by the IDE. installation
of missing libraries isn't implemented there though, but at least it's
cross-plattform that way...
btw, I appologize for my enthusiasm, I'm not responsible for Ultimate++
though. therefore: what do other c++ programmers think of this project?
--
Better send the eMails to netscape.net, as to
evade useless burthening of my provider's /dev/null...
P