Re: g++ free function conflict

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

bluedoze@yahoo.com (BlueDoze) writes:

> bluedoze@yahoo.com (BlueDoze) wrote in message 
> news:<a53ecee3.0408040051.3043d5d2@posting.google.com>...
> 
> sorry I didn't mean to top post ;-)

Ok, I was about to put you into my kill-file ... :-)

>  Actually my question is regarding the different behaviour between
>  cygnus compiler and g++ 3.2.3. and I want to check first if there's a
>  way to make the g++ 3.2.3 behave in this case as cygnus g++ compiler.

There is no "different behaviour" and there is no way to make
g++-3.2 accept *invalid* C++ code.

Your code compiles under cygwin probably because it doesn't 
"#include <malloc.h>" on that platform.

Cheers,
-- 
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.