[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90
From: |
John |
Subject: |
Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:11:18 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060909 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * John wrote on Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:02:32PM CET:
>
>>Is there some way to avoid having to use the capital F's?
>
>
> Not easily, without changes to Automake.
I guess I'll rename then.
>>I use the f90 extension regardless of whether the file is f90 or f95, so
>>I don't think I need to add this support.
>
>
> The issue is a bit different. If you intend your project to be portable
> to non-GNU compilers, then you may need this. For example for some AIX
> compiler drivers (e.g., xlf95 for compiling a file named *.F90), and I
> think maybe for Intel ifort as well.
My project is fairly small, so I'm not too concerned about being
portable to any Fortran compiler. I used to use a split f90/f95 naming
scheme, but I found it to cause many more headaches than it was worth.
Thanks,
John
- autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/10
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/11
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/12
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/12
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90,
John <=