[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?
From: |
Hi-Angel |
Subject: |
Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:16:33 +0300 |
So, it turned out to be a bug in linux 4.20.5 and earlier, so I
updated to 5.0, and everything is fine now.
I re-run tests, benchmark results now are tiny bit better for lexical
scope when GC is on, and are the same when GC is off:
With GC:
t: (8.451301031000002 87 1.5439787770000004), (8.492936438 85 1.527223621)
nil: (8.654444538 87 1.5810563760000003), (8.549887916 85
1.5612690489999996)
No GC:
t: (7.548030708 0 0.0) (7.591869120999999 0 0.0)
nil: (7.519884027 0 0.0) (7.577961806 0 0.0)
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 00:22, Hi-Angel <hiangel999@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> done https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34809
>
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 23:48, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > Do you want me to open a report for above?
> >
> > Yes, please: this is definitely not right.
> >
> >
> > Stefan
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, (continued)
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/08
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/09
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Hi-Angel, 2019/03/10
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?,
Hi-Angel <=
- Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/03/11