Re: when nothing happens, buffer still marked as modified

[Emanuel Berg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> Don't you think it is confusing, even
>> incorrect, to have the buffer change status
>> when the data hasn't changed from
>> the command?
>
> The data did change, it just eventually
> arrived at the same contents. Sheer luck.

I see. In a way that makes sense. If you hit
someone in the head with a bottle, but by sheer
luck do not inflict any physical or mental
damage whatsoever, it should still be
considered a crime. Put it up `**' in the
criminal record with my blessing!

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573